Search blog.co.uk

Is Buddhism a Religion or a Philosophy?

by cishanjia @ 2008-02-13 - 20:30:29

What is a philosophy?

The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy begins its definition of philosophy as:-

"Philosophy. (Greek, love of knowledge or wisdom) The study of the most general and abstract features of the world and categories with which we think: mind, matter, reason, proof, truth, etc. In philosophy, the concepts with which we approach the world themselves become the topic of enquiry."

There are aspects of Buddhism which may be said to be philosophical. Its analysis of the world gives reassurances that there is some kind of order. The Four Noble Truths says that there is suffering, stress, discontent, discomfort and so on, that they have a cause, that they have an end, and provides the way to the end in the Noble Eightfold Path. The teachings on Karma provide a thorough and logically self-consistent explanation of cause and effect. In this way, Buddhism is a logical analysis of the human condition and of the world that may be said to be a philosophy.

Yet Buddhism does not rest solely on speculation and logical reasoning, which may be based on speculative premises. Instead it relies on personal experience and development of skills to gain understanding and wisdom. While book learning and instruction are important on the Buddhist path, it is not merely a domain of intellectual thought but a "road map" to be used. The essential practice uses methods of meditation and intuitive insight to reach the goal of Nirvana; the ultimate escape from suffering, stress and so on. In this way, Buddhism may be said not to be a philosophy.

What is a Religion?

Religion, as the Oxford Concise Dictionary of World Religions says, is hard to define.

If all religions share a belief in a transcendent ideal then Buddhism is one whose ideal is Nirvana. This is a state of being that is completely transcendent to our ordinary mode of existing. It is the ultimate goal of Buddhist learning and practice. In this way, Buddhism may be said to be a religion.

But Buddhism does not posit a supreme being, a creator god, a deity, an omniscient loving divinity or transcendental soul to which we may appeal for salvation. Instead, Buddhism tells us to "pull ourselves up by our bootstraps" and remove the unwholesome and unskilful habits that lead to our suffering, stress and so on. In so doing, we are to replace them with wholesome and skilful practices that lead us to true nobility and to the ultimate goal of Nirvana. You are your own saviour, and the teachings and teachers merely guides and helpers on the journey. "You must do the work; even the Buddhas do put point the way." In this way, Buddhism may be said not to be a religion.

What is Buddhism?

The debate continues even among Buddhists. But one description that most may accept is that of Buddhism as a "way of life" or a "way of living"; even just of "living" itself. There is a certain amount to be taken "on faith", and those who have gone before are deserving of respect. But this is arguably so in any science. You place faith in the skills of a surgeon, for example.

If you call it this or that, it is sure to appeal to some because of it, and to equally repel others in the same way. Call it a religion and those seeking religion may be drawn to its religious aspects; yet those repelled by any hint of religion may reject it even before looking into it. Those of other creeds may then condemn Buddhism as a form of herecy. Call it a philosophy and the rational may see its intellectual merits, yet reject any apparently more spiritual aspects as irrational.

Why do You Ask?

But if the stark and final conclusion of Buddhism is anything, it is this. Why call it anything? Nirvana is attained only by giving up such attachments, among other things. Why not come with an open mind and see what Buddhism has to offer you, personally, if anything? If you find it helpful at first, why not stay and see what deeper things it has to say? You are free to come and to leave as you please. But only you can do so freely - by leaving labels at the door and browsing. If you come to a shoe store wanting a coat, you won't find anything useful. If you come to a shoe store not wanting anything, who knows whether you will find a good pair of shoes?

..
With reference to:-
Blackburn, Simon. (2005). Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd Ed.). OUP.
Bowker, John. (1997). Oxford Concise Dictionary of World Religions. OUP.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bullitt/bfaq.html


 
 

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

For me a religion has to have a supernatural element. Buddism posits reincarnation, which has to be a supernatural process - your comments?

cishanjiacishanjia [Member]
14/02/08 @ 18:51

Hi, Munzly. Thank you for your comment.

This is a sticky question! Firstly because my intention with this post was simply to encourage anyone choosing to read it to look into Buddhism for themselves, without any preconceptions. Buddhism does not claim to be a revealed religion, but recommends personal investigation of its merits or otherwise. And secondly because the concept of rebirth is usually not the same in Buddhism as people expect. To explain punarbhava, often better translated as rebecoming or rebirth, is tricky even with beginners in Buddhism, let alone non-Buddhists! This is because it involves other ideas that can easily be misunderstood too. So forgive me if I do not do so here. In any case, there are other people, authors and Buddhist sites that I'm sure could do a much better job.

Simply put, if by reincarnation you mean the equivalent of metempsychosis in Western philosophy or (I think) its approximate parallel in Hinduism, then, not really, no. Metempsychosis (Oxford, Philosophy) is defined as: "the transmigration of the soul". Since Buddhism doesn't posit the existence of souls*, this is not an applicable definition.

So I don't think it is correct to say that Buddhism posits reincarnation. The conclusion that Buddhism has that as a supernatural element strictly in that respect I think is incorrect.

As to the extended question of whether Buddhism has a supernatural element or elements, that is a matter of debate even among Buddhists! Part of the diversity of thought that has arisen is because of this question. I certainly could not do this justice, especially in a short commentary reply; even if I were qualified to do so.

The main findings of Buddhism are why we have suffering, stress and so on, and how we can end it. It is important to understand and apply that in the here and now. The common threads are the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path, and that is enough for anyone to begin with - to assess Buddhism's basic merits for the individual and to try to understand before choosing between schools, and so on.

..
*(Oxford, Philosophy): "Soul. The immaterial 'I' [or psyche] that ... maintains a perfect [i.e., self-existent, eternal, separate, indivisible and immutable] identity from birth (or before) to death (or after)."

Right, that's clear enough. It is that point - supernatural or non-supernatural than stopped me from going further into Buddhism. I have my own "way-of-life/philosophy" in which this anomaly does not arise.

Sorry if I've disturbed your flow... :)

cishanjiacishanjia [Member]
14/02/08 @ 22:06

That's fair enough.

There is only flow. :)

chassychassy [Member]
15/02/08 @ 12:11

Sounds like an interesting "way-of-life/philosophy" Munz, mind elaborating?

I would love to, but it takes fifty years to define and I'm still looking for the right words to describe it. Let's just say "Strive to live with a light touch, understand everything and believe in nothing."

deleted user [Visitor]

08/03/08 @ 08:23

We give our own meanings and definitions for the things we experience and the actions we take, whether we realize it or not, so as to whether Buddhism could be defined as a philosophy, religion or even as a brand of psychology, as some people call it, is really dependent on the individuals experience of it. This is why religion is such a hard word to define, because there is very little common ground on which people can agree either "this is what religion is", or "This is not what religion is." Everyone is different.

My personal experience of Buddhism leads me to think that it is certainly a very worthwhile, spiritual, moral, existential philosophy (and if that is what a religion is, then so be it). I think, as you seem to have already alluded to, there are certainly elements that have to be taken on faith initially, e.g., that the teachings are correct, Nirvana is attainable, the idea that karma exists and is real, re-birth- be it metaphorical or literal, etc. As one gets deeper, into any religion I'm sure, the picture becomes clearer and our own analysis of what's what appears.

For myself, I like to have a cocktail of religions, as I believe they all contain valid questions and answers as to the nature of reality and the human condition. They are all, in their own way, reflections of the ultimate truth, or whatever you want to call it. None of them are complete, however, we can only go on the journey ourselves, although we can certainly get some help along the way. I suppose in this sense I would agree with what you said about Buddhism being a "road map", and even define any religion as a "road-map", with many different forms, to deeper meaning and understanding of existence.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Recent Posts

  1. Karma and purification
    by astronut on 2008-03-25
  2. Buddhist Builder Buried Alive Survives by Meditating.
    by cishanjia on 2008-03-11
  3. Kindness.
    by cishanjia on 2008-02-11
  4. Welcome!
    by cishanjia on 2008-02-09

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.